Brilliant engineering teams are still drowning in tools that weren't built for how developers actually work. GitScrum bridges the gap between where code lives and where projects are managed—bringing IDE-inspired clarity to task management.
No card • Free for small teams • 5-minute setup
This wasn't accidental. It was a deliberate rejection of how "task management" was supposed to look.
Themes
Zero Compromise
Dracula · Nord · Tokyo Night · Catppuccin · Monokai Pro · Synthwave · One Dark · Gruvbox · Solarized · Material · Ayu · Everforest +42 more
We didn't pick 54 IDE color schemes because it was easy. We did it because developers are deeply attached to their environments—and switching contexts shouldn't mean abandoning the aesthetic that keeps you in flow.
One click. Instant preview. Your workspace, your rules.
It's the default. Because developers don't work in bright rooms with fluorescent lighting. They work at 2 AM with a terminal open and music playing. GitScrum respects that reality.
Most teams ship features fast to impress investors. We ship quality to keep developers loyal.
Speed without craft creates technical debt. Craft without speed creates vaporware. We believe both are possible when you hire people who genuinely care about their work.
They're professionals with refined taste, muscle memory, and zero tolerance for patronizing interfaces.
You can't trick them with gradient buttons and onboarding tours. They evaluate tools like they evaluate code: by what it does, not what it claims to do.
Most PM software forces teams into rigid workflows invented by consultants who've never shipped code.
We built GitScrum around how developers already think. Projects are folders. Sprints are branches. Tasks are commits. The metaphors you live with, applied to project management.
It's a baseline expectation. Like keyboard shortcuts. Like markdown support. Like performance that doesn't slow down when your backlog hits 1,000 issues.
These aren't "nice-to-haves." They're the difference between a tool developers use and a tool they tolerate because their manager bought it.
We don't scale headcount aggressively. We curate.
Every person who builds GitScrum could ship this product themselves. That's the bar. Not "can they follow a sprint plan," but "do they care deeply about what they build".
Because craft isn't a process. It's a culture. And culture dilutes faster than most founders admit.
Word-of-mouth isn't a growth hack. It's what happens when you build something developers actually want to talk about.
No sales teams cold-calling CTOs. No desperate LinkedIn outreach. Just a tool so well-designed that engineers convince their teams to switch.
GitScrum wasn't born in a whiteboard brainstorm or a VC pitch deck.
It was built by engineers who spent 20 years watching brilliant teams drown in tools that fought their workflow. Who saw a lot of money disappear because task tracking couldn't keep up with reality. Who got tired of opening Jira and feeling like they'd left their IDE for a different century.
We built GitScrum because we needed it to exist.
We're not scaling headcount to hit growth metrics. We're hiring people who care deeply about what they build—developers who understand that dark mode isn't a feature request, it's a baseline expectation.
Every person on this team could ship this product themselves.
That's the bar.
We didn't raise $50M to "disrupt project management." We built a sustainable business by solving a real problem for developers who are tired of tools that don't respect how they work.
Our investors are operators—CTOs, engineering leads, founders who've lived the chaos. They back GitScrum because they would've paid for it themselves.
Thousands of teams have moved from Jira, Monday, ClickUp, and Asana to GitScrum.
Not because we outspent them on ads. Because developers convinced their teams to switch.
Ready to try a task management tool that doesn't fight you?
No credit card • Setup in 5 minutes
