Linear Gets a Lot Right Let's be honest: Linear is excellent.
- Blazing fast - Beautiful interface - Keyboard-first - Git integration works - Opinionated in good ways For internal product teams, Linear might be perfect. This isn't about Linear being bad.
It's about when Linear isn't enough. The Gaps 1.
No Native Time Tracking Linear doesn't track time. Philosophical choice: They believe time tracking hurts productivity.
Agencies billing hours: 'Cool philosophy. I need to invoice clients.' You'll need a separate time tracker.
Clockify. Another tool.
Another context switch. Data in different places.
2. No Client Portals Linear is for teams.
Sharing with clients? Give them Linear access.
Clients don't need your internal workflow. Clients shouldn't see your messy backlog.
Clients want progress, deliverables, communication. Linear doesn't solve client visibility.
3. Opinionated Hierarchy Linear's structure: Workspace > Team > Project > Issue.
Fixed. What if you need: - Epic > Story > Task > Subtask?
- Different hierarchy per project type? - More flexible organization?
You adapt to Linear's opinions. Sometimes that's fine.
Sometimes it's limiting. 4.
Pricing at Scale Linear: $10/user/month. Not expensive.
But adds up. Agency with 20 people + 15 contractors?
That's $350/month for Linear. Plus time tracking tool.
Plus client communication tool. 5.
Product Team Focus Linear optimizes for product development teams. Roadmaps.
Cycles. Product-thinking.
Agency work is different: - Multiple clients simultaneously - Time-based billing - Client communication crucial - Project handoffs common Linear's product focus shows in missing agency features. Who Needs More Than Linear?
Agencies: Billing clients requires time tracking. Consultancies: Client portals crucial for communication.
Freelancers with clients: Need professional client-facing interface. Teams doing client work: Separate client view from internal chaos.
Product teams building their own product: Linear might be perfect. Teams serving external clients: Linear might not be enough.
GitScrum: Linear-Like + Agency Features We admire Linear's approach: - Speed matters - Keyboard shortcuts matter - Clean interface matters - Git integration matters We added what agencies need: 1. Native Time Tracking - Timer on every task - Track as you work - Export for billing - No separate tool 2.
Client Flow Portals - Purpose-built client access - Show progress without internal mess - Clients see deliverables - Clients communicate within context - Always free for clients 3. Flexible Hierarchy - Story > Task > Subtask native - Adapt structure to project needs - Less rigid than Linear 4.
Better Pricing for Agencies - 2 users FREE forever - $8.90/user/month for more - Clients always free - Time tracking included - No additional tools needed The Decision Framework Choose Linear if: - Internal product team - No time tracking needed - No client-facing needs - Linear's hierarchy fits your work - You love minimalism absolutely Choose GitScrum if: - Agency or consultancy - Bill clients by time - Need client portals - Want flexibility in structure - Need all-in-one solution Both are good tools. For different use cases.
Honest Comparison Speed: Linear: Exceptionally fast GitScrum: Fast (not Linear-level, but fast) Git Integration: Linear: Excellent GitScrum: Excellent Time Tracking: Linear: None GitScrum: Native Client Portals: Linear: None GitScrum: Built-in Hierarchy: Linear: Fixed, opinionated GitScrum: Flexible Pricing: Linear: $10/user/month (all paid) GitScrum: 2 free, $8.90/user/month Philosophy: Linear: Minimalist perfection for products GitScrum: Practical completeness for agencies
The GitScrum Advantage
One unified platform to eliminate context switching and recover productive hours.











