How to Actually Calculate PM Software Value The Wrong Way: Price Per Seat Most comparisons look like this: - Tool A: $10/user - Tool B: $15/user - Tool C: $25/user Conclusion: Tool A is best value!
Wrong. This ignores: - What's included at that price - What's locked behind higher tiers - What requires separate add-ons - Setup and admin costs - Training time required The Right Way: Total Cost of Ownership + Actual Usage Real value calculation: 1.
License Cost (base) 2. + Add-on Costs (integrations, features) 3.
+ Admin Time (setup, maintenance) 4. + Training Time (onboarding, learning curve) 5.
/ Features Actually Used = True Cost Per Useful Feature Case Study: 8-Person Development Team Scenario: Dev team needs GitHub integration, sprint planning, time tracking. Tool A (Enterprise Platform): - Base: $15/user x 8 = $120/month - Time tracking add-on: $30/month - GitHub integration: Included but complex - Admin time: 4 hours/month x $50 = $200/month (annualized setup) - Training: 16 hours x $50 = $66.67/month (first year) - Total: $416.67/month first year - Features used: 15 of 100+ (15%) - Cost per used feature: $27.78/month Tool B (Visual Platform): - Base: $20/user x 8 = $160/month (Pro tier needed for GitHub) - Time tracking: Included at Pro - GitHub integration: Surface-level only - Admin time: 2 hours/month x $50 = $100/month - Training: 8 hours x $50 = $33.33/month - Total: $293.33/month - Features used: 20 of 80 (25%) - Cost per used feature: $14.67/month - But: GitHub integration doesn't meet dev needs GitScrum: - Base: $8.90/user x 6 = $53.40/month (2 free) - Time tracking: Included - GitHub integration: Native, bi-directional - Admin time: 30 min/month x $50 = $25/month - Training: 2 hours x $50 = $8.33/month - Total: $86.73/month - Features used: 8 of 10 core features (80%) - Cost per used feature: $10.84/month Result: GitScrum delivers better value because: 1.
Lower base cost ($53.40 vs $120-160) 2. No add-ons needed 3.
Minimal admin time 4. Faster training 5.
Higher feature utilization The Value Equation for Development Teams What dev teams actually need (and use): 1. GitHub/GitLab integration 2.
Sprint planning 3. Task management 4.
Time tracking 5. Team collaboration 6.
Basic reporting What enterprise tools charge extra for: - Integrations you use - Features behind 'Pro' tier - Storage/bandwidth - Support beyond basic GitScrum value proposition: - All core features at $8.90/user - 2 users free forever - No feature tiers - No integration fees - No storage limits that matter Value Comparison Matrix: | Factor | Enterprise Tools | Visual Tools | GitScrum | |--------|-----------------|--------------|----------| | Base Price | $15-25/user | $12-20/user | $8.90/user | | Free Tier | None/Limited | None/Limited | 2 users forever | | GitHub Integration | Add-on or complex | Limited | Native | | Time Tracking | Usually add-on | Varies | Included | | Sprint Planning | Included (complex) | Basic | Full (simple) | | Admin Overhead | High | Medium | Low | | Training Time | Days | Hours | Minutes | | Feature Utilization | 15-25% | 20-30% | 70-90% | The Hidden Value Killers 1. Unused Features Paying for 100 features but using 15 = 85% waste GitScrum focuses on what dev teams use 2.
Tier Locking 'That feature is in our Business tier' GitScrum: One tier with everything 3. Per-Seat Minimums '3-seat minimum at this tier' GitScrum: Pay for exactly what you need (plus 2 free) 4.
Annual Lock-in '40% discount if you commit annually' GitScrum: Same price monthly or annually 5. Integration Costs 'GitHub integration requires Pro plan' GitScrum: Native integration at base price 6.
Support Costs 'Priority support is $X extra' GitScrum: All customers get the same support Calculating Your True Value Step 1: List features you actually use (be honest) Step 2: Price each tool at the tier that includes those features Step 3: Add admin/training time costs Step 4: Divide by feature utilization percentage Step 5: Compare true cost per useful feature Most teams find: - Enterprise tools: High absolute cost, low utilization = poor value - Mid-range tools: Medium cost, medium utilization = average value - GitScrum: Low cost, high utilization = best value for dev teams Value for Different Team Sizes: 2-Person Team: - GitScrum: $0/month (both users free) - Competition: $20-50/month minimum - Value advantage: 100% savings 5-Person Team: - GitScrum: $26.70/month (3 paid, 2 free) - Competition: $60-125/month - Value advantage: 55-79% savings 10-Person Team: - GitScrum: $71.20/month (8 paid, 2 free) - Competition: $120-250/month - Value advantage: 41-72% savings 20-Person Team: - GitScrum: $160.20/month (18 paid, 2 free) - Competition: $240-500/month - Value advantage: 33-68% savings The Best Value Decision If you're a development team that: - Works with GitHub/GitLab - Needs sprint planning - Tracks time - Values simplicity over feature bloat GitScrum offers the best value because: 1. Lowest per-user cost ($8.90) 2.
2 users always free 3. All features included 4.
Minimal overhead 5. Highest feature utilization Value = Useful Features / True Cost GitScrum wins that equation for development teams.
The GitScrum Advantage
One unified platform to eliminate context switching and recover productive hours.











