Solution

Large Teams PM 2026 | 100 Devs $872/mo Not $21K

Enterprise PM: 100 devs = $18K-60K/year plus sales calls and annual locks. Same $8.90/user at 5 or 500—no enterprise tax, no contracts. Free trial.

Also on

Large Teams PM 2026 | 100 Devs $872/mo Not $21K

The Enterprise Pricing Problem Large team PM costs: ├─ Jira Premium: $17.

Why Enterprise Tiers Exist Enterprise tier features: ├─ Advanced permissions ├─ SSO (which should be standard) ├─ Audit logs ├─ Priority support ├─ Custom contracts ├─ Dedicated CSM ├─ Training sessions What you actually need: ├─ Task management ├─ Git integration ├─ Sprints ├─ Cross-team visibility ├─ Basic permissions You're paying for sales overhead, not product value. GitScrum at Scale 100+ developer organization: ├─ Multiple teams on one account ├─ Projects per team ├─ Cross-team visibility when needed ├─ Git integration across all repos ├─ No per-team licensing ├─ No feature restrictions Scaling example: ├─ 50 devs: $427.10/month ├─ 100 devs: $872.20/month ├─ 200 devs: $1,762.40/month ├─ Linear scaling, no tiers Multi-Team Coordination Large org structure: ├─ Platform team (15 devs) ├─ Frontend team (20 devs) ├─ Backend team (25 devs) ├─ Mobile team (15 devs) ├─ DevOps team (10 devs) ├─ QA team (15 devs) ├─ Total: 100 developers GitScrum approach: ├─ Project per team ├─ Shared visibility across projects ├─ Cross-team dependencies visible ├─ Sprint coordination ├─ One bill: $872.20/month Cross-Team Dependencies Large org reality: ├─ Feature needs Platform + Frontend + Backend ├─ Dependencies between teams ├─ Release coordination required ├─ Blockers affect multiple teams GitScrum handles: ├─ Link tasks across projects ├─ 'Blocked by: Platform task 123' ├─ Cross-project view ├─ Release milestone spanning teams ├─ No hidden dependencies Repository Scale Large org repos: ├─ 50+ repositories ├─ Microservices architecture ├─ Multiple frontend apps ├─ Mobile apps (iOS, Android) ├─ Infrastructure repos GitScrum Git integration: ├─ Connect unlimited repos ├─ No per-repo pricing ├─ Commits from all repos visible ├─ Task can span repos ├─ Monorepo or multi-repo Permissions Without Complexity Typical permission needs: ├─ Everyone sees their team's work ├─ Leads see all teams ├─ Some cross-team visibility ├─ Not 47 permission roles GitScrum approach: ├─ Project-level access ├─ Simple: Admin, Member, Viewer ├─ No enterprise permission matrices ├─ Works for 99% of cases No Sales Call Required Traditional enterprise PM: ├─ 'Request a demo' ├─ Sales call scheduled ├─ Discovery call ├─ Pricing call ├─ Legal review ├─ 4-8 weeks to get started GitScrum: ├─ Sign up ├─ Add users ├─ Start working ├─ 10 minutes to get started ├─ Add 50 more users tomorrow ├─ No contract negotiation No Annual Commitment Enterprise contracts: ├─ Annual commitment required ├─ Locked in for 12 months ├─ Cancel = lose money ├─ Company changes = stuck GitScrum: ├─ Monthly billing ├─ Cancel anytime ├─ Scale up/down monthly ├─ Layoffs?

Reduce users instantly ├─ Hiring? Add users instantly ├─ Flexibility built in Onboarding 100 Developers New team member: ├─ Invite via email ├─ Connect personal Git ├─ See team board ├─ Start contributing ├─ 5-minute onboarding No training required: ├─ Board is self-explanatory ├─ Git workflow familiar ├─ Same interface at 5 or 500 users ├─ No enterprise complexity Audit and Compliance Enterprise needs: ├─ Activity logs ├─ Change history ├─ Who did what, when ├─ Export capabilities GitScrum provides: ├─ Task history ├─ Git commit trail ├─ User activity ├─ Export data ├─ Without enterprise pricing SSO Question 'But we need SSO!' Let's do the math: ├─ Jira Premium (with SSO): $17.50/user ├─ 100 users: $21,000/year ├─ GitScrum: $8.90/user ├─ 100 users: $10,466/year ├─ Savings: $10,534/year ├─ Buy SSO solution separately ├─ Still save money Or: Use Git provider's SSO.

Your developers already authenticate through GitHub/GitLab. Real Large Team Experience 'We were paying $25,000/year for Jira.

The CFO asked why task management costs more than some engineers. Switched to GitScrum, saved $14,000/year.

Same workflow, same Git integration, simpler interface. The real kicker: no annual contract.

When we had layoffs, we reduced users immediately. Jira would have kept charging us.' - VP Engineering, 120-person company Migration Path From Jira/Monday/Asana: ├─ Export existing data ├─ Import to GitScrum ├─ Run parallel for 1 sprint ├─ Team adapts quickly ├─ Full migration: 1-2 weeks No long implementation project.

No consultants required. Support at Scale 'Do we get enterprise support?' GitScrum support: ├─ Same support for all users ├─ No tiered support levels ├─ Direct access to help ├─ No 'submit a ticket and wait' You're not paying for a CSM you'll email twice a year.

Pricing Comparison Summary 100 developers, annual cost: ├─ Jira Premium: $21,000 ├─ Monday Enterprise: ~$30,000 ├─ Asana Business: $36,588 ├─ ClickUp Business: $14,400 ├─ GitScrum: $10,466 GitScrum savings: ├─ vs Jira: $10,534/year ├─ vs Monday: ~$19,534/year ├─ vs Asana: $26,122/year ├─ vs ClickUp: $3,934/year 200 developers: ├─ Multiply savings by 2 ├─ GitScrum: $20,932/year ├─ Jira Premium: $42,000/year ├─ Savings: $21,068/year What You Get All features at $8.90/user: ├─ Git integration (GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket) ├─ Unlimited projects ├─ Unlimited repos ├─ Sprints and boards ├─ Wiki documentation ├─ Time tracking ├─ Team collaboration ├─ API access ├─ Data export No enterprise tier. No hidden features.

No pricing surprises. Start Without Sales Call 1.

Connect repos 4. Start shipping 5.

Invoice: $872.20/month No demo required. No contract negotiation.

No enterprise process. Just project management that scales.

The GitScrum Advantage

One unified platform to eliminate context switching and recover productive hours.

problem.identify()

The Problem

Enterprise pricing punishes growth - $15-50/user at scale. 100 devs = $18,000-60,000/year. Budget spent on PM tool, not engineers.

Sales process required - 'Request demo' → weeks of calls → contract negotiation. Time wasted before tool even selected.

Annual contracts lock you in - 12-month commitment required. Layoffs? Still paying. Pivot? Still paying. No flexibility.

Enterprise features you don't need - Advanced permissions, custom workflows, dedicated CSM. Paying for overhead, not value.

Multi-team coordination complex - Cross-team visibility requires expensive tier. Dependencies hidden. Releases chaotic.

SSO used as price anchor - Basic security feature locked behind enterprise tier. Forces upgrade entire organization.

solution.implement()

The Solution

Linear pricing forever - $8.90/user at any scale. 5 users or 500 users. No enterprise tier. No per-seat negotiations.

No sales process - Sign up, add users, start working. 10 minutes. No demos, no calls, no contract negotiation.

Monthly billing, cancel anytime - Scale up or down monthly. Layoffs = remove users immediately. Hiring = add users instantly.

All features included - Same features at $8.90 as 'enterprise' tiers elsewhere. Git integration, sprints, wiki, all of it.

Multi-team native - Cross-project visibility built-in. Link dependencies across teams. No expensive tier required.

Simple security model - Project-based access. Admin/Member/Viewer roles. Works for 99% of organizations. No SSO tax.

workflow.steps()

How It Works

Sign Up Instantly

No sales call. No demo. Sign up, start inviting your 100+ developers immediately.

Create Team Structure

Projects per team. Connect all repos. Set up in an afternoon, not a quarter.

Enable Cross-Team Visibility

Link dependencies across projects. Release milestones span teams. Coordination built-in.

Scale as Needed

Add or remove users anytime. Monthly billing. No contracts. $8.90/user forever.

expertise.verify()

Why GitScrum

GitScrum addresses Project Management for Large Development Teams - Scale Without Enterprise Tax through Kanban boards with WIP limits, sprint planning, and workflow visualization

Methodology

Problem resolution based on Kanban Method (David Anderson) for flow optimization and Scrum Guide (Schwaber and Sutherland) for iterative improvement

Capabilities

Kanban boards with WIP limits to prevent overload
Sprint planning with burndown charts for predictable delivery
Workload views for capacity management
Wiki for process documentation
Discussions for async collaboration
Reports for bottleneck identification

Industry Practices

Kanban MethodScrum FrameworkFlow OptimizationContinuous Improvement

features.related()

Related Features

View all features

Git Integrations

Unlimited repos - Connect 50+ repositories across all teams. No per-repo pricing. All commits link to tasks automatically.

Sprint Planning

Ship faster without the chaos. Drag-and-drop backlog prioritization, velocity tracking across iterations, and burndown charts that update as work gets done—not when someone remembers to update a spreadsheet. Your team always knows what's next, stakeholders see progress without asking, and {vertical} across {city} consistently hit their sprint commitments.

Kanban Boards

Cross-team visibility - See dependencies across projects. Release coordination visible. No expensive enterprise tier needed.

Wiki & Documentation

New hires asking the same questions. Process docs scattered across Google Docs, Notion, and Slack pins. Sound familiar? Build your team's single source of truth with rich text editing, nested pages, and instant search. {vertical} in {city} onboard new members 3x faster when everything is documented once and findable forever.

Team Management

Scale without friction - Add 50 users today, 50 more tomorrow. No contract renegotiation. No sales call. Just add and pay $8.90/user.

Frequently Asked Questions

Still have questions? Contact us at customer.service@gitscrum.com

Why is there no enterprise tier?

Because enterprise tiers exist to maximize revenue, not value. The features in 'enterprise' tiers cost almost nothing to provide. GitScrum charges $8.90/user because that covers costs and margin. No sales team to fund, no enterprise overhead.

How do you handle 100+ users without enterprise features?

Most 'enterprise features' are unused. You need: tasks, Git integration, cross-team visibility. GitScrum provides all of that. Advanced permissions, custom workflows, dedicated CSM - most large teams don't actually use these.

What about SSO?

Two options: 1) Use your Git provider's SSO - developers already authenticate through GitHub/GitLab. 2) Calculate the savings: GitScrum vs Jira for 100 users = $10,000/year savings. Buy a separate SSO solution and still save money.

Can we get a volume discount?

The price IS the volume discount. $8.90/user is already 40-70% less than competitors at scale. Linear pricing means you're not punished for growing. 100 users at $8.90 = $872/month, not $1,750/month like Jira.

Ready to solve this?

Start free, no credit card required. Cancel anytime.